ArticleJMIR dermatology2026
Informatics-Based Psychotherapeutic and Psychiatric Interventions in Dermatology: Scoping Review of Impacts on Skin Disease Severity and Mental Health Outcomes.
Article in JMIR dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- European Dermatologists' Perception and Awareness of Teledermatology Use: Results From an International Survey Promoted by the EADV Teledermatology Task Force.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic dermatologic conditions such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and hidradenitis suppurativa are associated with a high burden of psychiatric comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, and suicidality. Despite growing awareness of the psychosocial impact of skin diseases, mental health needs remain underaddressed in dermatologic care. Digital technologies (including teledermatology, mobile health apps, and internet-delivered psychotherapies) offer promising avenues for integrating psychotherapeutic and psychiatric interventions into dermatology. However, the scope, effectiveness, and implementation of such informatics-based approaches remain poorly mapped in the literature. Objective: This scoping review aimed to systematically identify, categorize, and synthesize studies on digital psychotherapeutic and psychiatric interventions targeting patients with dermatological conditions, with a focus on clinical, mental health, and implementation outcomes. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across 5 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar) for articles published up to March 2025. Studies were included if they involved patients with dermatologic conditions and assessed interventions that combined a digital informatics component (eg, telehealth, apps, artificial intelligence, virtual platforms) with a psychotherapeutic or psychiatric element (eg, cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT], mindfulness, consult-liaison psychiatry). Eligible study designs included clinical trials, observational studies, and mixed methods research. Data were extracted systematically, and methodological quality was assessed using JBI tools. Results: Out of 15,176 records identified, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most interventions targeted psoriasis (9/11) and used asynchronous digital platforms such as internet-based CBT and mobile apps. Across studies, dropout rates ranged from 10% to 76%. Improvements in dermatologic quality of life were reported in 6 of 11 studies, with statistically significant reductions in depression and anxiety observed in multiple trials (eg, internet-based CBT and mindfulness-based interventions), alongside reductions in psoriasis severity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) and itch intensity in randomized controlled trials. Intervention duration ranged from single-session virtual reality exposure to 8- to 12-week structured programs. However, long-term outcomes beyond 3 to 12 months were rarely assessed, and reporting of sociodemographic variables and equity-related factors was limited. Conclusions: Informatics-based psychotherapeutic and psychiatric interventions represent a promising frontier in psychodermatology, with early evidence suggesting feasibility and potential clinical benefit. Digital platforms may expand access to mental health support and improve holistic care for patients with dermatologic conditions. However, significant gaps remain in terms of equity, long-term effectiveness, integration into clinical workflows, and adaptation for diverse populations. Future research should focus on rigorous, inclusive trials and the development of hybrid models that blend digital and face-to-face care to ensure sustainable and equitable impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.