ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026
Legume genome structures and histories inferred from Cercis canadensis and Chamaecrista fasciculata genomes.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosome-level reference genome of a foundational California native legume, Acmispon strigosus.The Journal of heredity · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level genome assembly of Tamarindus indica provides new insights into the evolution of triterpenes and tartaric acid biosynthetic pathway.Molecular horticulture · 2026Article
- Impacts of gene duplication in the evolution of symbiotic root nodule symbiosis in legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Dualistic MADS-box evolution forged legume diversity post-WGD.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The legume family originated ca. 60-65 million years ago and soon diversified into at least six lineages (now extant subfamilies). The signal of whole genome duplications (WGD) is apparent in species sampled from all six subfamilies. The early diversification has posed difficulties for resolving the legume backbone structure and the timing of WGDs, especially in Caesalpinioideae where the diversification and WGD signals coincide. In this study, we report the genome sequences and annotations for Cercis canadensis (Cercidoideae) and Chamaecrista fasciculata (Caesalpinioideae) to help resolve the timings of WGDs relative to subfamily origins and the ancestral legume karyotype. Analyses of genome assemblies from four subfamilies within Fabaceae show that the last common ancestor of all legumes likely had seven chromosomes, with a genome structure similar to the extant Cercis genome. The retained karyotype structure, the lack of a WGD in the last 100+ Mya (Cercis and the lineage leading to it following the eudicot γ whole-genome triplication), and the unusually slow rates of nucleotide substitution and structural evolution in the Cercis genome underscore its utility as a genomic proxy for the last common ancestor of all legume species. Our analysis supports an allopolyploid origin of Caesalpinioideae, with progenitors from lineages along the backbone of the legume phylogeny. Rapid diversification and the inferred allopolyploid origin of Caesalpinioideae provide a partial explanation for the difficulty in resolving the backbone of the legume phylogeny and early Caesalpinioideae diversification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.