ArticleBlood advances2026
Impact of fludarabine exposure on CAR T-cell outcomes in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe impact of fludarabine pharmacokinetics (PK) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell outcomes is not fully elucidated. We hypothesized that in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), measured fludarabine exposure during lymphodepletion would correlate with CAR T-cell results. We conducted a prospective, single-center study including patients with R/R LBCL treated with commercial, CD19-targeted CAR T-cell products. Up to 7 plasma samples per patient were collected at predefined intervals during lymphodepletion. Fludarabine exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) was estimated using a population PK model. An iterative cubic spline approach identified optimal AUC exposure ranges specific to each CAR T-cell product. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Among 54 patients with a median follow-up of 24.5 months, the median fludarabine AUC was 18.12 mg·h/L (interquartile range, 14.56-20.55). Optimal exposure windows were 17.5 to 21.5 mg·h/L for axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and 14.0 to 18.0 mg·h/L for tisagenlecleucel, with 24 patients (44%) inside these ranges. Median PFS after CAR T-cell infusion was not reached vs 13.3 months in the optimal vs other cohort (P = .03). In the multivariable analysis, optimal exposure remained independently associated with improved PFS (P = .03), together with axi-cel treatment (P = .03). CAR T-cell expansion and rates of any grade cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and hematotoxicity were similar between groups. In conclusion, the prospective measurement of fludarabine exposure identified an optimal AUC window associated with prolonged PFS in patients with R/R LBCL receiving CAR T-cell therapy. These findings support the integration of PK-guided fludarabine dosing to enhance therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.