ArticlePloS one2026
Learning strategies, study behaviors, and academic performance among medical students in Jordan: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Academic performance in medical education is influenced by multiple factors, including learning strategies and study behaviors. However, the extent to which these factors are associated with academic performance remains unclear. This study aimed to describe the frequency of learning strategies and examine their associations with academic performance among medical students, with emphasis on evidence-based strategies. A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was conducted among medical students at Jordan University of Science and Technology. Learning strategies were assessed using ten items rated as rarely, sometimes, or often. Composite indices were constructed for overall, evidence-based, and common/passive strategies. Academic performance was categorized as excellent, very good, or good or below. Group comparisons were performed using chi-square tests and ANOVA, and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with excellent performance. Among 556 respondents, 52.2% reported excellent performance. Evidence-based strategies showed a graded increase across performance groups and were independently associated with higher odds of excellent performance (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16-1.86), whereas common/passive strategies were not. These findings suggest that evidence-based learning strategies are associated with better academic performance, supporting their potential role in medical education. However, the findings are exploratory rather than causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.