ArticlePloS one2026
Dynamic effects of China's national volume-based procurement on generic drug consistency evaluation: An interrupted time series analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesChina's national volume-based procurement (NVBP) policy uniquely requires the generic drug consistency evaluation (GCE) for generic drugs on the purchase list. It employs large-scale centralized procurement to lower the prices of qualified generic drugs and encourages manufacturers to get GCE certification for their generic drugs. Although it is a fundamental part of the NVBP system, research on the impact of NVBP on manufacturers has only recently emerged and is still not comprehensive enough. This study is the first to systematically evaluate the dynamic effects of the NVBP policy on the quantity of GCE-certified generic drugs and uncover their relationship in terms of both time and quantity. STUDY
designInterrupted time series analysis(ITSA).
methodsThe NVBP lists were published by the National Healthcare Security Administration (NHSA). The information of GCE-certified generic drugs was obtained from the databases of the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) and the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE). Generic drugs were divided into four categories: all GCE-certified generics; GCE-certified generics of NVBP-listed drugs (NVBP-GCE generics); GCE-certified generics of non-NVBP drugs (non-NVBP GCE generics); and GCE-certified generics from each individual NVBP list.
resultsOverall, the 2018 NVBP intervention resulted in a monthly increase of 2.876 in generics certified by GCE (95% CI: 1.311-4.317). In contrast, the 2016 policy showed no statistical significance. Both NVBP-GCE and non-NVBP GCE generics experienced significant increases, with NVBP-GCE showing a more rapid initial rise. In the analysis of 8 NVBP batches, the 2016 intervention had no significant statistical impact on either the immediate or long - term effects. Conversely, the 2018 intervention significantly increased the quantity of GCE - certified generics in the short term and widened the gap between NVBP - GCE generics and non - NVBP GCE generics. Nevertheless, this effect gradually diminished over time. The quantity of NVBP - GCE generics reached its peak before or at the release of each NVBP list, while non - NVBP GCE generics continued to grow.
conclusionThe NVBP policy has resulted in a substantial increase in the quantity of GCE - certified generic drugs. From a comprehensive perspective, the growth rates of NVBP-GCE generics and non-NVBP GCE generics were comparable. The maximum number of GCE - certified generic drugs was witnessed either prior to or simultaneously with the release of each round of NVBP procurement documents. After the publication of each NVBP announcement, the number of GCE - certified generics on that particular procurement list started to decrease, whereas the number of non - NVBP GCE generics continued to increase steadily until April 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.