ArticlePloS one2026
Feasibility of mechanomyography-based fatigue classification for passive lower-limb exoskeleton evaluation: A pilot study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanomyography (MMG) enables non-invasive monitoring of muscle mechanical activity, while its utility in time-resolved fatigue detection during dynamic human-exoskeleton interaction remains underexplored. This pilot study explored the feasibility of combining MMG with machine learning to characterize neuromuscular fatigue and evaluate passive lower-limb exoskeleton assistance during repetitive 10 kg squat-lifting tasks. MMG signals from five lower-limb muscles were extracted for time-domain, frequency-domain and nonlinear features, and fatigue identification was implemented via a spectral-based criterion and multi-muscle voting optimization. A radial basis function-enhanced random forest (RBF-RF) model integrated with data augmentation was validated through leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. The results demonstrated that the 1/5 voting rule achieved optimal performance, with mean accuracy of 0.913 ± 0.057, AUC of 0.792 ± 0.073, and a low fatigue detection error of 1.4 ± 0.8 s. Data augmentation steadily improved model robustness, and predicted fatigue levels were significantly correlated with subjective perceived exertion (ρ = 0.756, p < 0.001). This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of MMG-based fatigue monitoring for wearable assistive systems. The proposed framework supports objective, high-temporal-resolution fatigue monitoring, and may serve as a viable tool for assessing wearable assistive systems. Further large-cohort studies are required to validate its generalizability for practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.