ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring staff and service user experiences of personality disorder services in open prisons: A qualitative study of Pathways Enhanced Resettlement Support.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Re-entering the community following a prison sentence is a critical period for rehabilitation, especially for people in prison with a likely diagnosis of personality disorder. A joint health and criminal justice initiative across England and Wales, called the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) Pathway, aims to support individuals with a likely diagnosis of personality disorder with services across different prison and community settings. Pathways Enhanced Resettlement Services (PERS) are OPD services operating in five open prisons in England, which aim to support people at high risk of being returned to closed conditions or reoffending in the community after release. We aimed to understand how service users and staff experience PERS. We purposively selected staff and service users within male prisons to encompass a range of staff roles and current and ex-service users. We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten staff and nine service users (seven current and two ex-service users). We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis, generating three themes: (1) "A shock to the system": this theme describes the challenges of adapting to open prison culture as a liminal space between closed conditions and the community; and understanding and accepting PERS as a service to provide support within and beyond that space. (2) "We've got some understanding of their journey": This theme describes how service users felt valued by PERS support that was centred around their needs, a personalised approach that enabled the development of trusting, therapeutic relationships. (3) "Internal states can be real barriers to progression": this theme describes how PERS staff were able to use the therapeutic relationships they developed with service users to support them to progress through their sentence. Staff and service users felt that PERS provided support to progress through open prison, largely by developing positive trusting relationships and individualised support plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.