ArticlePloS one2026
"Backed into a Corner": Lived experiences of receiving and providing involuntary psychiatric treatment under British Columbia's Mental Health Act.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
British Columbia's Mental Health Act permits the involuntarily detention and treatment of individuals who meet specific criteria. Over the past 15 years, British Columbia has seen an increasing trend in the number of involuntary psychiatric admissions. This qualitative study explores the experiences of people receiving and providing involuntary psychiatric treatment within two health organizations in British Columbia, Canada. Five focus groups were conducted with 23 individuals who had previously received involuntary psychiatric treatment at a facility operated by one of the two health organizations. All sessions were facilitated by individuals with lived experience of involuntary psychiatric treatment. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 clinical staff and 10 non-clinical support personnel involved in delivering involuntary psychiatric treatment or associated services. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, guided by an equity-oriented care framework. Seven themes were generated, including the limited availability of voluntary care options, the compounding role of social determinants of health in mental health crises, the lack of conclusive evidence supporting involuntary psychiatric treatment, the negative impacts on both patients and providers, and the importance of peer support. Across themes, participants described involuntary psychiatric care as shaped by systemic constraints with limited access to upstream, voluntary and community-based alternatives. These findings highlight the need for system-level reform to reduce reliance on coercive practices and to expand access to voluntary, community-based mental health supports that address underlying social and structural factors contributing to mental health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.