Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42268804›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

To the moon: Retail investor attention and sentiment across asset types in online media.

Michael L Smith, Nicole J Olynk Widmar, Valerie Kilders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael L SmithPurdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6379-8338
Nicole J Olynk WidmarPurdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6574-5295
Valerie KildersPurdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8064-0443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media facilitates community building for users of varied and broad interests. Personal and retail (individual non-professional) investment communities have grown popular, and some engage in commentary on currencies and market events, while others coordinate action within markets. This analysis quantifies online and social media data about the US dollar and gold, as well as cryptocurrencies and stocks subject to attention shocks (including meme stocks), from 2020 through 2023. Using Quid's social media listening platform, mentions of these four distinct topics were collected and analyzed separately to quantify the volume of mentions and sentiment of search results on a weekly basis. Statistical relationships between the asset groups and major events in the study period are explored; we assess public reactions to the regional bank failures, GameStop and AMC short squeeze events and the evolution of the crypto market. Large volumes of online media commentary on these topics suggest a sustained high level of interest in currency and investment markets, with evidence of the increasing influence of online communities in how the public views or talks about these markets.

Indexed as

CommerceDigital MediaInvestmentsSocial MediaHumansInternet

Identifiers

PMID42268804
PMCPMC13252755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.