ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Clinical activity and validation of the disability disc in inflammatory bowel disease].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic immune-mediated pathology that causes disability and can be assessed by the simplified IBD-Disk tool, which could be conditioned by clinical activity. Objective: Associate disability with clinical activity using the IBD-DISK tool validated in patients with IBD. Material and methods: Analytical cross-sectional study in 101 outpatients and inpatients diagnosed with IBD. After obtaining informed consent, the IBD-Disk tool for disability was validated and administered, as well as its correlation with the IBD-DI. Clinical activity was assessed with the Mayo score for chronic nonspecific ulcerative colitis (CUCI) and the Harvey-Bradshaw score for Crohn's disease (CD). The association between disability and clinical activity was performed with a regression model. Results: The reliability of the IBD-Disk was > 0.900. Patients with CUCI and moderate or severe clinical activity are 8.2 times more likely to have an IBD-Disk score > 40 compared to those in remission or with mild activity. Patients with Crohn´s disease the association was OR = 2.4 (95%CI: 0.19 - 31.52). The regression model shows that clinical activity (Mayo and Harvey-Bradshaw) is the factor that most influences the disability scales (B = 4.400). Conclusions: IBD-Disk is a reliable instrument for measuring disability in CUCI and CD. Although disability does not differ significantly between CUCI and CD, clinical activity is associated with disability (IBD-Disk).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.