ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Acceptance of the respiratory syncytial virus infant monoclonal antibody nirsevimab among post-partum women in Italy.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purposes of the cross-sectional survey were to investigate among a sample of post-partum women in Italy the attitudes and the behaviors about the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infant monoclonal antibody and to explore any associations with different characteristics.The survey was conducted between March and April 2025 in teaching and public hospitals randomly selected in Southern Italy. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire through a face-to-face interview for those women in the maternity wards and by telephone for those who were at home.A total of 476 women completed the interview for a response rate of 96.6%. Half (50.8%) reported that the monoclonal antibody was very useful for the protection of the newborn, and this was more likely among mothers who trusted the information they received about vaccinations and those who had not received information from Internet or social media. A total of 86.5% had immunized their newborn against RSV. Women who had received at least one vaccination when pregnant, those who believed that the monoclonal antibody was very useful, those who did not acquire information from Internet or social media, and those who trusted the vaccination information acquired were more likely to have immunized their child.Education and communication strategies must be embedded in pre-natal and maternal health programs, and healthcare workers must be encouraged to actively inform and counsel every new cohort of pregnant women about the role of the RSV immunization to protect their children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.