ArticleDiscover oncology2026
A prognostic model for breast cancer based on mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane (MAM) signature genes.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAMs) have emerged as key regulators of breast cancer biology. Growing evidence indicates that MAM dysfunction affects tumor progression, immune regulation, and treatment response. However, their prognostic value and therapeutic relevance in breast cancer remain insufficiently clarified.
methodsWe curated 83 MAM-related genes from the literature and used TCGA breast cancer cohorts to construct a prognostic model through univariate Cox, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Protein-level validation was performed using the Human Protein Atlas (HPA). Functional enrichment, immune infiltration, immunotherapy response prediction, and drug sensitivity profiling were conducted between risk groups. Single-cell RNA-seq data (GSE255068) were analyzed to map gene expression within the tumor microenvironment. Finally, qRT-PCR and western blotting validated the expression of key genes in breast cancer cell lines.
resultsA four-gene signature (VDAC1, RYR2, PINK1, and TESPA1) robustly stratified breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups and independently predicted overall survival across multiple cohorts. A prognostic nomogram integrating the risk score with clinicopathological variables significantly improved survival prediction accuracy. Low-risk tumors were characterized by a more inflamed tumor microenvironment, with increased immune cell infiltration and enhanced immune-related pathway activity, and were predicted to respond more favorably to immune checkpoint blockade. In contrast, high-risk patients exhibited greater predicted sensitivity to multiple cytotoxic and targeted agents, a pattern that remained largely consistent across major molecular subtypes, highlighting the robustness of the signature beyond intrinsic subtype classification. Single-cell transcriptomic analyses further revealed distinct cell-type-specific expression patterns of the four genes within the tumor microenvironment. Finally, molecular experiments confirmed elevated expression of VDAC1, RYR2, and PINK1 in breast cancer cell lines, supporting their biological relevance in tumor progression.
conclusionsThis MAM-based prognostic model provides new insights into breast cancer biology and has potential utility in guiding personalized treatment, particularly regarding immunotherapy and chemotherapy sensitivity. Experimental validation highlights VDAC1 as a promising biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.