ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
Fat-suppression performance for in-stent plaque imaging after carotid artery stenting using three-dimensional T
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the optimal fat suppression technique for accurate in-stent plaque characterization after carotid artery stenting using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. A carotid artery phantom containing a stent and a reference vessel was imaged with a 3.0-T system using a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence combined with chemical shift selective, spectral attenuated inversion recovery, water excitation, and Dixon fat suppression techniques. Chemical shift selective and spectral attenuated inversion recovery showed increased signal intensity within the stent lumen and reduced contrast compared with the reference vessel, suggesting insufficient fat suppression likely related to radiofrequency shielding. In contrast, water excitation and Dixon provided more uniform fat suppression with comparable contrast ratios; however, Dixon imaging demonstrated susceptibility-related high signal along the stent contour that may compromise lumen assessment. Overall, water excitation combined with three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging achieved effective and uniform fat suppression without prominent susceptibility artifacts and appears to be the most suitable approach under phantom conditions for noninvasive in-stent plaque evaluation after carotid artery stenting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42268483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.