Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42268482›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2026

Performance evaluation of deep learning based YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 models for real time breast cancer detection in mammographic images.

Nibedita Sahoo, Aurobindo Kar, Vineeta Khemchandani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nibedita SahooSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Delhi NCR, Delhi, 203201, India.
Aurobindo KarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Delhi NCR, Delhi, 203201, India. aurobindo.kar@galgotiasuniversity.edu.in.
Vineeta KhemchandaniSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Delhi NCR, Delhi, 203201, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer detection remains a significant challenge in medical diagnostics. Traditional diagnostic methods are time-consuming, unable to detect complex patterns in medical images, and achieve only moderate accuracy with high false-positive rates. The study aims to identify the most effective and efficient algorithm for clinical application that reduces the rates of false positives and false negatives Various image segmentation methods are available, including U-Net (Ronneberger et al. in International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015), Mask R-CNN (He et al. in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2017), fully convolutional networks (FCNs) (Long et al. in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2015), and SegNet (Badrinarayanan et al. in IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 39:2481-2495, 2017). However, some of these have complex architectures, require extensive training time, and consume significant computational resources. Beyond these methods, other well-cited studies include CNN & context aggregation, transformer-based segmentation, promptable models, and medical-focused architectures. However, all of these still struggle with issues like long-range dependencies caused by the locality of convolutions, architecture design, high computational cost, require large amounts of pre-training data, not always being optimal for domain-specific tasks, high compute and memory demands, and the need for fine-tuning for specialised high-accuracy applications that are frequently trained on relatively small datasets. Therefore, this study employs YOLO, which is a DL-based one-step object detection algorithm that greatly enhances speed, accuracy, and recognition across various categories of image processing and video processing. It also lies in its ability to perform real-time object detection and its time-sensitive applications. This study assesses the effectiveness of two cutting-edge deep learning based object detection algorithms, YOLOv5 and YOLOv8, for early breast cancer screening and detection. A total of 2,620 digitised mammography images from film, including normal, benign, and malignant cases with verified pathology, are included in the original Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) dataset. Improving patient outcomes and early detection rates depends on the efficacy of these algorithms.YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 are used in this study to detect breast cancer lesions, and their performance metrics are compared. The results for YOLOv5 show an F1 score of 0.97, a precision-recall score of 0.97, and confidence scores for precision and recall of 0.67 and 0.98, respectively. The results for YOLOv5 show an F1 score of 0.97, a precision-recall score of 0.97, and confidence scores of 0.67 and 0.98 for precision and recall, respectively. The mAP of YOLOv8 is 0.99. Therefore, YOLOv8 outperforms YOLOv5 across all assessed parameters, indicating that it is more suitable for clinical use in automated breast cancer screening and detection. With YOLOv8's improved recall and precision, there may be a greater likelihood of accurate, early detection of breast cancer, thereby reducing false positives and negatives. Future research will refine these models for real-time use to improve comprehensive cancer screening programs and investigate their integration with other diagnostic techniques.

Indexed as

Breast cancer detectionDeep learningMammographic imagesPerformance evaluationYOLOv5YOLOv8

Identifiers

PMID42268482
PMCPMC13504053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.