ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
A mixed-method study of identifying symptom clusters in adult patients with advanced cancer.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to identify symptom clusters (SCs) in adults with advanced cancer using a mixed-method approach.
methodsThis parallel mixed-method study was conducted in academic cancer care centers in Ahvaz, Iran. In the quantitative phase, 640 patients completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, and SCs were extracted using hierarchical cluster analysis with dendrogram and heatmap visualization. In the qualitative phase, 24 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 participants, and data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Integration followed Creswell's approach through simultaneous comparison and joint display of findings. A multidisciplinary expert panel guided the data merging process.
resultsQuantitative analysis identified six clusters: gastrointestinal problems, appearance changes, respiratory issues, psychoneurological symptoms, mind-body symptoms, and hormonal. Qualitative analysis revealed seven clusters: mind-body symptoms, respiratory issues, appearance changes, psychoneurological symptoms, gastrointestinal problems, psychosocial symptoms, and spiritual-emotional symptoms. Integration led to eight final clusters. Five clusters were identified by both methods, mutually reinforcing and complementing one another. The hormonal cluster was exclusive to quantitative analysis, while psychosocial and spiritual-emotional clusters emerged only through qualitative analysis. Symptoms such as lack of energy, difficulty sleeping, worrying, feeling sad, and feeling nervous appeared across multiple clusters and were identified as overlapping (bridge) symptoms.
conclusionThe mixed-method approach enabled a multidimensional understanding of SCs in advanced cancer, allowing for both confirmation and expansion of findings. This study facilitates effective symptom management through the identification of SCs. Recognizing bridge symptoms offers key targets for intervention, with potential to impact multiple clusters simultaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42268436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.