ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Evaluating the role of follicular output rate in clinical and embryological outcomes in IVF: a prospective study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the association between follicular output rate (FORT) and embryological and clinical outcomes, including live birth rate, in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).
methodsThis prospective cohort study enrolled 166 patients undergoing IVF between October 2023 and January 2025. FORT was calculated as the ratio of pre-ovulatory follicles (16-24 mm) on trigger day to baseline antral follicle count (AFC; 3-9 mm), multiplied by 100. Patients were stratified into low, medium, and high FORT tertiles, and FORT was also evaluated as a continuous variable in multivariable logistic regression. An exploratory receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess discriminatory performance and to identify a data-derived reference threshold. All analyses were conducted separately for non-PCOS and PCOS cohorts.
resultsIn non-PCOS patients (n = 136), the number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and good-quality embryos differed significantly across FORT tertiles (all p < 0.05). Clinical pregnancy rates were 14.9%, 27.8%, and 37.2% in the low, medium, and high FORT groups respectively (p = 0.045), with corresponding differences in live birth rates (p = 0.049). On multivariable analysis, FORT (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.002-1.079; p = 0.039) and the number of available embryos (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.082-1.676; p = 0.008) remained independently associated with clinical pregnancy. Exploratory ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.607 (95% CI 0.52-0.69). A data-derived reference threshold of FORT at 64.2% was associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates compared with lower FORT values (40.9% vs. 23.3%; p = 0.030; OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.14-4.55). No significant associations were observed in the PCOS subgroup, though this analysis was limited by small sample size (n = 30).
conclusionsFORT is significantly associated with embryological and clinical pregnancy outcomes, including live birth, in non-PCOS IVF patients. As a cycle-specific functional measure of follicular responsiveness, FORT may complement static ovarian reserve markers for counselling and outcome stratification. FORT values in the higher range (approximately ≥ 65%) were associated with improved clinical pregnancy rates, but the limited discriminatory performance of the ROC analysis underscores the need for external prospective validation of this cutoff before any clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.