ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
The Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Complications in Prolapse Patients ≥ 70 Years Old.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisObesity is a recognized risk factor for developing pelvic organ prolapse and for perioperative complications. As the population ages, an increasing number of older, obese individuals with prolapse may opt for surgical repair. This study assesses the association between obesity and short-term perioperative adverse events (AEs) in women ≥ 70 years undergoing vaginal and laparoscopic prolapse surgery.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of older women undergoing vaginal and laparoscopic prolapse surgery at two medical centers from 2016 to 2023. Patients were classified as nonobese (< 30 kg/m
resultsOf 1507 older women, 20.8% (n = 314) were class 1 obese and 6.0% (n = 90) were class 2+ obese. Obese patients were younger and more likely to be frail, hypertensive, and diabetic (p < 0.05). Obese patients experienced greater estimated intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.05). Obesity was not associated with composite AEs or major AEs on multivariable analysis, but was found to be predictive of postoperative hematoma. Class 1 obese women had a 2.7-times greater odds (95% CI 1.17-6.22) and class 2+ obese women had a 4.7-times greater odds (95% CI 1.61-13.43) of hematoma compared to nonobese women. Obesity was not associated with major hematoma, defined as ≥5 cm or requiring medical or surgical intervention.
conclusionsObesity in older surgical patients is not associated with a greater incidence of composite AEs, but may be associated with postoperative hematomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42268414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.