ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Classifying smoking status using linear and non-linear models based on clinical health records.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Routine clinical chemistry data are widely collected in medical settings, yet their potential for lifestyle characterization using multivariate analysis remains underexplored. Leveraging these routinely available measurements could provide a cost-effective strategy for identifying lifestyle-related biochemical patterns at the population level. In this study, a range of linear and non-linear multivariate classification methods were evaluated to discriminate between smokers and non-smokers using 23 routine clinical chemistry measurements. Linear approaches included traditional partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), PLS-DA with bootstrap resampling, and logistic regression (LR), while non-linear models comprised support vector machines (SVM) and random forest (RF). The results revealed differences between linear and non-linear classification strategies. Random forest showed comparatively better classification performance for the present dataset under the evaluated conditions, suggesting its ability to capture complex relationships within the biological data. Variable importance analysis highlighted the cholesterol ratio, total protein, potassium, and lactate dehydrogenase as relevant contributors to class discrimination, suggesting systemic metabolic and physiological differences between smokers and non-smokers. Overall, the findings demonstrate that routinely available clinical chemistry parameters, when coupled with appropriate multivariate analysis, can effectively capture smoking-related biochemical alterations. This study contributes to the fields of clinical chemometrics and data-driven healthcare by demonstrating that standard laboratory measurements can support lifestyle stratification, offering a practical and accessible complementary screening strategy prior to more detailed metabolomic investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.