Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42268374›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2026

Pediatric magnetic resonance urography from patient preparation to post-processing: basics and controversies.

Giulia Gnocchi, Marcus Meneses, Suraj D Serai, Kassa Darge, Hansel J Otero

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia GnocchiDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, CHOP Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, 734 Schuylkill Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA. gnocchig@chop.edu.
Marcus MenesesDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, CHOP Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, 734 Schuylkill Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA.
Suraj D SeraiDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, CHOP Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, 734 Schuylkill Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA.
Kassa DargeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, CHOP Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, 734 Schuylkill Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA.
Hansel J OteroDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, CHOP Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, 734 Schuylkill Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance urography (MRU) is an advanced imaging technique that enables comprehensive evaluation of the kidneys and urinary tract, combining high-resolution anatomical and functional assessment without ionizing radiation. This review presents the current state of pediatric MRU, with a focus on its clinical indications, patient preparation, image acquisition, and post-processing methods for functional analysis. Current limitations and controversies are also addressed, together with a concise overview of emerging techniques that may further refine MRU applications in clinical practice.

Indexed as

ChildrenFunctional analysisKidneysMagnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance urographyProtocolUrinary tract

Identifiers

PMID42268374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.