ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Head-to-head pathologic validation of Node-RADS vs size-based criteria for cervical lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate diagnosis of cervical lymph node (CLN) metastasis is essential for staging nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Conventional size-based MRI criteria exhibit high specificity but low sensitivity, leading to underdiagnosis. This study pathologically validated the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) vs size criteria for diagnosing CLN metastasis in NPC. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with histologically confirmed NPC who underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of CLNs between March 2014 and April 2023 were included. All patients had a pretreatment head and neck MRI within 7 days before FNAC. Two blinded radiologists independently assigned Node-RADS scores (1-5) to each biopsied node according to the standardized workflow. Diagnostic performance was compared against conventional size-based criteria using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsA total of 273 patients (202 men; median age, 51.0 years [IQR: 37-65]) with 335 CLNs were included, of which 150 (44.8%) were malignant on FNAC. Using a cutoff of Node-RADS ≥ 4, sensitivity and specificity were 96.0% and 98.9%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), significantly higher than that of size-based criteria (AUC, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.79-0.86, p < 0.05). Among 227 size-negative nodes, Node-RADS achieved a sensitivity of 87.8% and specificity of 99.4%, correctly identifying 43 of 49 metastatic nodes missed by size criteria (AUC, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.89-0.98).
conclusionThe Node-RADS system significantly outperforms conventional size-based criteria for detecting CLN metastasis in NPC, particularly in size-negative nodes. By offering high sensitivity while maintaining excellent specificity, Node-RADS represents a robust imaging tool that could enhance nodal staging accuracy and precise treatment planning. KEY POINTS: Question Can a standardized MRI-based nodal scoring system improve the detection of metastatic CLNs in NPC, particularly when nodes remain below conventional size thresholds? Findings In this pathologically validated cohort, Node-RADS outperformed conventional size criteria and correctly identified most metastatic CLNs missed by size-based assessment. Clinical relevance The Node-RADS improves MRI-based detection of metastatic CLNs in NPC while preserving high specificity, supporting more accurate nodal staging and more precise radiotherapy target delineation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42268307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.