ReviewEuropean radiology2026
Middle meningeal artery embolization in chronic subdural hematoma: a paradigm shift?
Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common and growing neurosurgical condition, particularly in the elderly, with high recurrence rates following conventional surgical evacuation. Traditional management strategies primarily address mass effect through drainage but fail to target the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for hematoma persistence and recurrence. Increasing insights into the role of inflammation, angiogenesis, and fragile neovascular membranes supplied by the middle meningeal artery (MMA) have led to the development of MMA embolization as a targeted therapeutic approach. Over the past decade, MMA embolization has evolved from an experimental salvage technique to an evidence-based intervention. Early observational studies and meta-analyses demonstrated marked reductions in cSDH recurrence and reoperation rates compared with standard surgical management. More recently, large randomized controlled trials have provided consistent, high-level evidence confirming that MMA embolization, particularly as a surgical adjunct, lowers rates of hematoma recurrence, treatment failure, and serious adverse events. Consequently, contemporary consensus guidelines released in 2025 endorse MMA embolization as a class I recommended adjunct therapy for selected patients with nonemergent cSDH. Beyond its adjunctive role, MMA embolization is increasingly being explored as a standalone treatment option. This minimally invasive strategy holds particular promise for frail, elderly patients or those with significant comorbidities who are at high risk for surgical complications. Ongoing trials are aimed at refining patient selection, optimal intervention timing, and embolic techniques. In summary, current evidence supports a paradigm shift in cSDH management toward a pathophysiology-driven, preventive, and increasingly endovascular treatment model. KEY POINTS: Question Does middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization represent a paradigm shift in chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) management? Findings Randomized trials show MMA embolization, as a surgical adjunct, reduces recurrence and treatment failure in cSDH, earning a Class I guideline recommendation. Clinical relevance MMA embolization shifts cSDH management from reactive surgical drainage to a proactive strategy targeting the pathologic neomembranes. This pathophysiology-based approach prevents hematoma recurrence, improving long-term outcomes and establishing a new treatment paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.