ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2026
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Intellectual Disability in Children With Cerebral Palsy.
Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntellectual disability (ID) affects approximately 45% of children with cerebral palsy (CP), yet early identification is frequently hindered by severe motor and communication impairments. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework for predicting ID risk in children with CP.
methodsIn this retrospective, registry-based study, data from 807 children with CP were analysed. To ensure temporal validity, all predictors were restricted to clinical and neuroimaging assessments confirmed by 2 years of age. Eight ML algorithms were trained and compared on an independent test set, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret model output at both the global and the individual levels.
resultsThe optimized models achieved robust discriminative performance, with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) reaching 0.813 on the independent test set. SHAP analysis revealed a highly skewed distribution of predictive features: The inability to achieve independent sitting by age 2 was the most critical risk factor, followed by early-onset epilepsy, spastic quadriplegia and severe Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels. Baseline perinatal factors demonstrated lower direct predictive utility, and local SHAP analyses successfully mapped individualized risk trajectories.
conclusionsThis transparent ML approach functions as a reliable decision-support tool, translating complex algorithmic output into clinically intuitive insights. It may empower clinicians to move from 'wait-and-see' approaches towards timely, personalized neurodevelopmental interventions for high-risk children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.