ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026
Distinct mechanisms of contextual modulation for dynamic natural scenes in motion- and scene-selective cortex.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterizing surround suppression with dynamic natural scenes.Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural responses in visual cortex to a central stimulus are modulated by its surrounding context. Although this contextual modulation is well established for simple stimuli, how it manifests during dynamic naturalistic scene perception remains unclear. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined how motion congruence and categorical similarity between central and surrounding scenes shape contextual modulation across the visual hierarchy. Central and surrounding scenes systematically varied in categorical similarity (identical exemplar, different exemplar of the same basic-level category, different basic-level category, or different superordinate category) and in motion direction (same or opposite direction). Neural responses were measured in primary visual cortex (V1), motion-selective cortex (hMT+), and scene-selective occipital and parahippocampal place areas (OPA and PPA). hMT+ showed robust motion-dependent contextual modulation, with stronger suppression for same-direction motion. V1 responses were sensitive to low-level similarity between center and surround, with reduced responses when center and surround were physically identical and moved in the same direction. In contrast, scene-selective regions (OPA and PPA) did not show univariate modulation by motion congruence or categorical similarity, but multivoxel activity patterns reflected the categorical relationship between center and surround. Multivariate analyses further showed that decoding accuracy in OPA and PPA increased as categorical similarity decreased. Together, these results demonstrate that contextual modulation in natural vision differs across visual regions, reflecting sensitivity to motion relationships in hMT+, low-level similarity in V1, and higher-level categorical structure in scene-selective cortex. These findings highlight how contextual influences operate at multiple levels of visual representation to support the processing of dynamic natural scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.