ArticleHERD2026
Evaluating Environmental Ward Performance: Insights From Acoustic, Lighting, and Temperature Monitoring in a Palliative Care Unit.
Article in HERD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The physical environment of inpatient wards plays a critical role in supporting rest and care delivery. In palliative care, environmental conditions such as sound, lighting, and temperature directly influence patient comfort, circadian rhythms, and staff performance. However, few studies have quantitatively assessed these factors in functioning palliative care units (PCUs).ObjectivesTo evaluate the spatial and environmental performance of an acute PCU through sensor-based monitoring of acoustic exposure, light levels, and temperature.MethodA postoccupancy evaluation approach was employed to assess conditions within inpatient rooms. Environmental loggers recorded data continuously at 1-min intervals across two 1-month periods. Parameters included sound levels (Lmax, Leq, Lmin in A-weighted decibels) to reflect perceived loudness, lighting (lux), and temperature (°C). Measurements were benchmarked against World Health Organization and Australian guidelines for sleep-supportive healthcare environments. Data were collected from both single- and multibed rooms in a metropolitan tertiary hospital PCU.ResultsSound levels frequently exceeded recommended thresholds. Nighttime averages reached 54 dB(A), while daytime LAeq exceeded 60 dB(A), with minimal day-night variation (<6 dB), indicating sustained exposure. Lighting data showed repeated nighttime spikes above 20 lux and insufficient daytime illumination for circadian regulation. Temperature exhibited minimal diurnal variation (<2°C), falling short of conditions known to support sleep.ConclusionEnvironmental monitoring revealed persistent deviations from sleep-supportive conditions. These stressors likely impact both patient well-being and staff performance. Findings underscore the need for evidence-based design strategies and translational research that position the built environment as an active contributor to holistic care. In palliative contexts, architectural design should enable rather than simply contain clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.