Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267850›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026

The course and management of symptom diagnoses in general practice.

Asma Chaabouni, Suraya Jubar, Juul Houwen, Reinier Akkermans, Iris Walraven, Kees van Boven, Tim Olde Hartman, Henk Schers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Asma ChaabouniDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5731-9993
Suraya JubarDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Juul HouwenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Reinier AkkermansDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Iris WalravenDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kees van BovenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tim Olde HartmanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-1206
Henk SchersDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute of Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn general practice, symptom diagnoses are commonly used when patients seek care for symptoms in which no specific disease or disorder can be diagnosed. These diagnoses are prevalent, yet little is known about how they evolve or how General Practitioners (GPs) manage them in daily practice.

aimTo explore the course of symptom diagnoses and compare GPs' management strategies, both for symptom diagnoses that persisted for more than a year or changed into disease diagnoses.

methodsA retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted using the Dutch Family Medicine Network (FaMe-Net) database. We included all episodes of care in which the diagnosis recorded at the first consultation was coded as a symptom diagnosis between 2008 and 2021. The course of each EoC was analyzed, comparing management strategies, such as GP contacts, interventions, referrals, and medication use, between symptom diagnoses that persisted and those that changed into disease diagnoses. Referrals to primary healthcare workers include referrals to nurses, social workers and therapists such as physiotherapists and occupational therapists.

resultsOut of the 12,532 EoC that started as symptom diagnoses, 9.4% changed into a disease diagnosis within a median of 22 days [2-239], 85.8% resolved within one year, and 4.3% persisted as symptom diagnoses. Within the course of the first year of care, a significantly higher number of management strategies were found for EoC that changed into a disease diagnosis. Referrals to primary healthcare workers were lower for EoC that changed into disease diagnoses (OR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.74, 0.87],

conclusionSymptom diagnoses are more likely to resolve within a year, and only a few will persist or change into disease diagnoses. GPs can rapidly diagnose diseases. Our findings highlight the importance of reassurance in patient care when discussing the prognosis of symptom diagnoses, as most of these symptoms tend to resolve.

Indexed as

General PracticePractice Patterns, Physicians'Symptom AssessmentAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedically Unexplained SymptomsMiddle AgedNetherlandsReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studiesepidemiologylarge datamedically unexplained symptomspersistent somatic symptomsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID42267850
PMCPMC13255199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.