ArticleClinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery2026
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Case-Control Study.
Article in Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery' (ERAS) protocols have been developed for multiple surgical procedures with favourable outcome measures including Length of Stay (LoS). Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) has similarly facilitated earlier patient discharges, particularly in comparison to open head and neck surgical techniques. There is a dearth of literature on the effect of ERAS protocols in TORS. We sought to comprehensively examine the effect of a TORS ERAS protocol across several key metrics, with a focus on LoS.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study following implementation of a TORS ERAS protocol. This protocol was developed at our institution and implemented in 2021; it included key features such as pharyngocutaneous risk stratification and thorough perioperative assessments. Patients managed prior to (p-ERAS) and post implementation (w-ERAS) were separated into two groups, with key outcomes, including LoS, estimated cost per patient, return to swallow, and complication rate, compared.
resultsA total of 40 TORS cases were included. Patients managed w-ERAS had a mean adherence rate to protocol of 90%. The w-ERAS group showed a statistically significant reduction in median length of stay by 3.5 days (p = 0.03) when compared to the p-ERAS group. There was also a trend towards decreased median cost per patient as well as decreased median time to oral intake.
conclusionOur study demonstrates an easily implementable protocol for the perioperative management of TORS oncological surgery. The use of this ERAS protocol demonstrated a significant reduction in patient length of stay in a small sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.