ArticleBJU international2026
Delphi consensus on ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrograde robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a patient with localized prostate cancer: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPositive surgical margins (PSMs) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) increase the risk of prostate cancer recurrence, often requiring salvage treatments that may compromise functional recovery. Intraoperative frozen section can detect PSM but is not feasible as a routine approach in most settings. Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) provides a rapid, real-time alternative, though evidence remains limited and knowledge gaps persist. This international Delphi consensus aimed to define expert recommendations on the clinical application of and workflow and research priorities for the safe integration of FCM during RARP. MATERIAL AND
methodsA modified Delphi process was conducted following the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and reported according to the ACCORD checklist. In total, 32 international experts in urology and pathology participated in a hybrid consensus meeting after structured literature review and preparatory online sessions. Forty-four evidence-based multiple-choice items across patient selection, image acquisition, and surgical management domains were developed and anonymously voted on via a secure online platform. Consensus was predefined as ≥80% agreement among respondents.
resultsConsensus was achieved for 24 of 44 items (55%). Key agreements included a risk-adapted use of FCM (97%), its role as an adjunct to magnetic resonance imaging for nerve-sparing decisions (87%), adoption of en-face imaging as the preferred FCM technique (82%), and a maximum reporting time of 30 min (85%). The panel endorsed formal certification for image interpretation (83%), standardized reporting of positive margin length (82%), and feasibility of remote intra-institutional reporting (84%). Larger (>3 mm) PSM in high-risk cases warranted complete neurovascular bundle resection (96%).
conclusionsThis consensus provides a structured framework for the intraoperative use of FCM during RARP, defining its indications, workflow standards, and training requirements. Future multicentre studies are needed to assess its oncological and functional impact and to establish standardized implementation pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.