Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267555›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Laparoscopic ultrasound eXAmination: Analysis of fellow surgeons learning curve in minimally invasive gynecologic procedures (LUXA study).

Maria Teresa Giudice, Francesca Moro, Marianna Ciancia, Consuelo Russo, Diana Giannarelli, Serena Cappuccio, Matteo Loverro, Camilla Fedele, Marco D'Indinosante, Andrea Rosati and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Maria Teresa GiudiceDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesca MoroDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marianna CianciaDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Consuelo RussoDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Diana GiannarelliEpidemiology and Biostatistics Facility, G-STeP Generator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Serena CappuccioDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Matteo LoverroDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Camilla FedeleDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marco D'IndinosanteDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea RosatiDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele PerroneDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesca CiccaroneDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Floriana MasciliniDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Anna FagottiDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco FanfaniDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonia C TestaDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLaparoscopic ultrasound (LUS), performed with an endoscopic ultrasound probe, has shown potential in addressing challenges related to haptic perception and lesion detection in minimally invasive surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the learning curve of gynecologic surgery fellows in achieving competency in LUS image acquisition during minimally invasive procedures.

methodsThis prospective single-center study included six gynecologic fellows with limited ultrasound experience who completed a one-day structured training program. Fellows performed laparoscopic ultrasound during elective surgeries for benign conditions and early-stage gynecologic cancers, assessing five anatomical sites. Competency was evaluated using learning curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) analysis based on image quality and examination time. Learning curve time and quality score for each surgeon and anatomical site were measured.

resultsA total of 56 patients and examinations were analyzed. All fellows achieved competency within 2-5 procedures, with LC-CUSUM showing rapid and sustained skill acquisition. Ovarian imaging required fewer attempts than myometrial wall and iliac vessel imaging, with the right external iliac vessels being the most challenging. Patient characteristics did not differ among fellows.

conclusionAfter targeted training, gynecologic surgery fellows can achieve proficiency in LUS within a short learning curve. These findings support the feasibility of integrating LUS training into gynecologic surgical education and highlight its potential to enhance surgical precision and to reduce surgical overall time.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEndosonographyGynecologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyLearning CurveMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsAdultFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleGynecologistsHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUltrasonographygynecologyimaging‐guided surgeryintraoperative ultrasoundlaparoscopic ultrasoundultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42267555
PMCPMC13674825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.