ArticlePsychological medicine2026
Computerized assessments of emotional expression and emotional reactivity predict negative symptoms in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNegative symptoms are a core feature of psychosis and a strong predictor of functional outcome, yet they remain difficult to assess due to conceptual and methodological challenges. Although abnormalities in emotional expressivity and emotional reactivity are documented in individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis, these domains are typically examined independently, and their relationship remains unclear.
methodsFacial expressions were quantified using automated facial analysis (FaceReader) during clinical interviews in 101 CHR individuals and 41 healthy controls (HCs). Emotional reactivity was assessed using the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Principal component analyses were conducted on facial expression and emotional reactivity variables within the CHR group. Associations with negative symptom domains, positive symptoms, and social functioning were examined using correlational and two-step regression analyses.
resultsCHR participants showed greater disgust expression than HCs (g = 0.40, uncorrected
conclusionsAutomated facial expression captured variance in some negative symptom domains that was largely independent of emotional reactivity. These findings support the use of multimodal, objective assessments to improve characterization of negative symptoms in psychosis risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.