ArticleJVS-vascular insights2025
Using natural language processing to extract carotid stenosis severity from clinical notes to create a nationwide veteran cohort.
Article in JVS-vascular insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The prevalence of moderate to severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ie, atherosclerotic narrowing of the extracranial carotid arteries) is generally approximately 6% and 2%, respectively. Most prior studies of carotid stenosis risk factors have been small. This study describes the development and validation of a natural language processing (NLP) tool to identify carotid stenosis and uses it to identify significant risk factors, presence, and severity of carotid stenosis. Methods: We created an NLP tool to extract the ratio of peak systolic velocity of the internal carotid artery to the common carotid artery (ICA/CCA ratio) in veterans receiving carotid duplex ultrasound examinations in the Veteran's Health Administration from 2001 to 2020. Among those who had at least one valid ICA/CCA ratio, we identified carotid stenosis severity (<50%, 50%-69%, ≥70%) based on the ICA/CCA ratio (<2, ≥2 to <4, ≥4) and assessed the association between presence and severity of carotid stenosis and clinical and demographic characteristics, including age, sex, self-identified race and ethnicity, smoking status, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, indicator variables for pre-existing hypertension, coronary heart disease, and type 2 diabetes, and selected laboratory measures (ie, hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and creatinine). Results: The harmonic F1 score of the NLP tool was 0.907 for the right value, 0.882 for the left value, and 0.920 for the maximum value. Among the 290,517 veterans in the cohort, the median age was 68.2 years. Black patients had 16% decreased risk of more severe carotid stenosis (odds ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.87, Conclusions: The NLP tool performed well, and the study performed with our NLP-created cohort largely validates the risk factors identified by previous smaller studies, demonstrating the utility of big data and NLP in carotid stenosis research. (JVS-Vascular Insights 2025;3:100302.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.