ArticleClinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association2026
Scoping Review of Experience Sampling Methodology Investigations of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms.
Article in Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a serious mental health condition with profound impact at both the individual and population level. In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in studying PTSD using experience sampling methodologies (ESM), which allow for nuanced examination of how symptoms are experienced in or near real time, in the natural contexts of individuals' lives. We conducted a scoping review of studies of adults that employed ESM to assess PTSD symptoms. Our primary goals were to characterize the participants of such studies, key design features of ESM studies of PTSD, and analytical approaches employed for ESM data of PTSD symptoms. We also examined to what extent the current literature reflects best practices in reporting for ESM/ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies. Our findings revealed an active and growing literature, with 136 published articles reflecting 89 unique samples identified. There were some commonalities across studies in population (e.g., US-based participants with unspecified trauma exposure), design (e.g., multiple assessments per day with Likert rating scales under an interval-contingent schedule), and analysis (e.g., representing symptoms as a composite in multilevel modeling). However, they varied in terms of design characteristics (e.g., study duration, number of assessments per day, other constructs assessed) and data analytic methods. Papers largely adhered to recent guidelines for reporting on ESM studies although opportunities for improvement were identified. Results support use of ESM to investigate the dynamics of PTSD symptoms. We discuss strengths and limitations of the existing literature and suggestions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.