Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267351›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Multimodal animal health monitoring in extensive livestock production systems.

Xintao Zhao, Qiyu Liao, Dadong Wang, Erik Meijering, Cara Brosnahan, Suzanne Keeling, Rugang Tian, Wenrong Li, Mhairi Sutherland, Jie Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xintao ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Qiyu LiaoCSIRO Data61, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dadong WangCSIRO Data61, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Erik MeijeringSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cara BrosnahanBeef + Lamb New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Suzanne KeelingBeef + Lamb New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Rugang TianInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Wenrong LiInstitute of Animal Biotechnology, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Mhairi SutherlandBeef + Lamb New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jie KangSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal production in extensive livestock systems faces significant health and welfare challenges due to variable environments, diverse climatic conditions, and practical constraints that limit close animal monitoring. By "extensive livestock systems", we refer to production systems characterized by large herd sizes, open-range grazing, and limited direct animal supervision, typical of beef cattle, sheep, and goat farming in rangeland environments. Conventional approaches, including visual inspection and periodic veterinary assessment, often provide incomplete and delayed insights into animal health status, limiting timely intervention for infectious and metabolic diseases. Recent advances in wearable sensors, imaging technologies, genomic testing, omics profiling, and environmental monitoring offer new opportunities for continuous, data-driven surveillance of livestock. However, when applied in isolation, these modalities capture only partial aspects of the complex biological and environmental processes that influence animal health and disease progression. Multimodal monitoring integrates these diverse data streams to provide a more comprehensive and dynamic representation of animal health. This enables earlier detection of disease risk, improved welfare outcomes, and enhanced support for veterinary and on-farm decision-making. Ultimately, such integration empowers farmers to achieve earlier and more precise interventions, reduce veterinary costs, and improve overall animal welfare and productivity in extensive systems. This review synthesizes current approaches to multimodal monitoring in extensive livestock systems, explores data integration strategies, and evaluates key challenges for practical implementation, including cost, scalability, and data interoperability. We conclude by outlining future research directions that prioritize feasibility, affordability, and farmer-centered design to facilitate real-world adoption.

Indexed as

animal health and welfaredisease surveillanceextensive livestock systemsmultimodal monitoringprecision livestock farming

Identifiers

PMID42267351
PMCPMC13243129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.