Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267343›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ortopedia2026

[Current Concepts in the Treatment of Distal Femur Fractures in Adults].

Fabricio Fogagnolo, Ricardo Antônio Tavares

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabricio FogagnoloDepartamento de Ortopedia e Anestesiologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-6495-3383
Ricardo Antônio TavaresDepartamento de Ortopedia e Anestesiologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-5675-3034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal femur fractures account for approximately 1% of all fractures and 3 to 7% of femoral fractures, representing complex injuries that frequently affect articular surfaces. Computed tomography is essential to evaluate articular involvement, the presence of coronal fracture lines, and metaphyseal comminution. Surgical treatment aims to restore mechanical alignment and articular congruity while providing sufficient stability to allow early mobilization.The epidemiology shows a bimodal pattern: in younger patients, high-energy trauma predominates, whereas in older patients, low-energy falls are more common, with higher mortality related to osteoporosis and comorbidities. Conservative treatment has limited indications and is often reserved for patients with high surgical risk or for nondisplaced fractures.Surgical management includes locking plates, retrograde intramedullary nails, and combined fixation techniques. Dual fixation has gained increasing attention in osteoporotic bone, cases with loss of medial support, and periprosthetic fractures. In selected cases, particularly in older patients with severely compromised bone quality, knee arthroplasty may be an alternative for early mobilization. The present article presents an updated review of the main epidemiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of distal femur fractures, including special situations such as open fractures, Hoffa fractures, and periprosthetic fractures.Complications such as infection, nonunion, stiffness, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis remain frequent.

Indexed as

femoral fracturesHoffa fracturekneeosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID42267343
PMCPMC13246245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.