Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267323›Full record

ArticleThe journal of climate change and health

Advancing and integrating climate and health policies in Brazil: Insights from national policy stakeholders.

Maria Daniela de Araújo Vianna, Patrícia Zimermann, António Mauro Saraiva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Daniela de Araújo ViannaUniversity of São Paulo - Institute of Advanced Studies - Planetary Health Brazil Praça do Relógio, 109 São Paulo, 05508-050, Brazil.
Patrícia ZimermannUniversity of São Paulo - Institute of Advanced Studies - Planetary Health Brazil Praça do Relógio, 109 São Paulo, 05508-050, Brazil.
António Mauro SaraivaUniversity of São Paulo - Institute of Advanced Studies - Planetary Health Brazil Praça do Relógio, 109 São Paulo, 05508-050, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Climate change poses increasingly severe risks to human health, exacerbating social inequalities and placing additional pressure on the overall resilience of health systems, particularly in Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS). These intersections remain poorly explored in Brazilian national policy agendas. This study presents perspectives from national stakeholders on the current integration of climate and health policies, ideals for integration, barriers to achieving ideals, opportunities, and strategies for overcoming barriers and advancing integration. Materials and Methods: This article synthesizes findings from an investigation of Brazil's climate-health policy landscape based on 33 semi-structured interviews that underwent a qualitative content analysis. Results: Stakeholders perceive a lack of coordination between the climate and health sectors in Brazil, fragmented governance, limited dedicated funding, and a low prioritization of health in climate agendas (and vice versa). Nonetheless, ongoing revisions to national climate plans, the SUS´s national reach, the momentum of COP30, and well-informed civil society pressure create openings for policy integration. Key barriers include silos, political polarization, short-term political cycles, and the absence of systematic data. Promising strategies include improved communication, embedding health co-benefits in sectoral policies, improving funding, and promoting community-based resilience. Participants recognize the need to align policies, but identified multiple barriers, including institutional inertia, vested interests, and a lack of prioritization of these agendas. Strengthening intersectoral governance, advocacy, and social pressure, reducing silos, expanding research, education, and communication on the climate-health nexus, and amplifying risk perception are vital to advancing this agenda. Conclusion: There is a consensus that climate and health policies in Brazil are poorly integrated, forgoing crucial mutual benefits. Promising opportunities and strategies for integration include coordinated governance, evidence-based policymaking, persistent advocacy, and targeted communication efforts.

Indexed as

BrazilClimate and healthClimate changeHealth systemPublic policies

Identifiers

PMID42267323
PMCPMC13245511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.