ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Workload analysis of pilot steep turn maneuvers using SR20 aircraft and EEG data.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare left vs. right steep turns in terms of workload-related neurophysiological signatures using electroencephalogram (EEG) and machine learning. Methods: Thirty-seven flight cadets performed one left and one right steep turn in an SR20 desktop flight simulator while a 32-channel EEG (Emotiv EPOC Flex 32) was recorded. From 2-s sliding windows (50% overlap), 800 features per window were extracted (time-, frequency-, and non-linear domains). Six classifiers (XGBoost, LightGBM, GB, SVM, LR, and Linear SVC) were evaluated using cross-subject nested cross-validation with variance-ranked feature subsets (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%), and an additional 10% subset was assessed to identify a more parsimonious feature set. Results Objective EEG/ML: LightGBM demonstrated superior performance across all feature proportions. Subjective: NASA-TLX was significantly higher in right turns than in left turns (5.55 ± 1.13 vs. 4.98 ± 1.06, Interpretation: These findings support MWL-associated directional neurophysiological differences in steep turns and identify candidate EEG markers for lightweight real-time workload monitoring, facilitating optimized flight training and enhanced aviation safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.