ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Paramedic mental health literacy and psychiatric emergencies: A qualitative pilot study in Gauteng, South Africa.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paramedics in South Africa frequently respond to psychiatric emergencies in complex, high-risk pre-hospital environments. Their care is shaped by limited formal training, workplace cultures and varying mental health literacy, alongside legal, ethical and contextual constraints specific to emergency medical services. Despite these demands, little research has examined paramedics' perceptions, attitudes and experiences of psychiatric emergencies in South Africa. Aim: To explore paramedics' perceptions, attitudes and experiences of psychiatric emergencies and how they influence assessment, communication and decision-making in the pre-hospital setting. Setting: Paramedics working in private and public emergency medical services in Gauteng, South Africa. Methods: An exploratory qualitative design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight paramedics across Basic, Intermediate and Advanced Life Support levels. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis to identify patterns across participants' accounts. Results: Five themes were identified. Participants described limited formal training in psychiatric emergency care, resulting in reliance on experiential learning and peer modelling. Communication and de-escalation were viewed as essential but inconsistently supported by training and resources. Workplace humour, stigma and emotional distancing were commonly described as coping responses, with divergent views regarding their impact on patient care. Ethical and legal uncertainty shaped conservative or coercive decision-making around consent, restraint and sedation. Cultural, linguistic and environmental factors complicated assessment and engagement. Conclusion: Despite commitment to supporting psychiatric patients, significant educational and structural gaps constrained effective care. Enhanced training, reflective supervision and context-sensitive guidance may improve patient experiences and paramedic decision-making. Contribution: This study contributes to understanding how South African paramedics perceive and manage psychiatric emergencies in pre-hospital settings, highlighting educational, ethical, and contextual challenges influencing care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.