ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Utilisation of digital educational technology amongst undergraduate nursing students in the Western Cape.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite increased integration of digital technologies in higher education, nursing students face major barriers in resource-limited settings. Aim: The study investigated the utilisation of digital educational technologies amongst undergraduate nursing students in the Western Cape. Setting: The study was conducted at the school of nursing at a higher education institution in the Western Cape. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey design with a self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 253 participants. Descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the frequencies and percentages; the mean score and Chi-square test were conducted to determine the association between the variables. Results: Nearly 90% of participants had experience in the use of digital educational technology, 94.5%, learning management system and Facebook, and 93.7% used PowerPoint, communication and collaboration tools. The gender differences in technology use are consistent with the literature. The results suggest female respondents' frequent use of social networks. Male respondents reported more frequent use of bibliographic and web conferencing technologies. Although overall use was very low, gender remains an important factor in understanding technology use. In contrast, blogs, discussion forums and immersive technologies were amongst the least utilised educational technologies. Conclusion: Most nursing students use basic digital tools like learning management systems, Facebook and PowerPoint, but advanced tools such as blogs, forums and immersive technologies are underused, revealing a gap in digital competence that limits collaborative learning and clinical simulation. Contribution: This study provides evidence on digital technology use amongst undergraduate nursing students, showing frequent use of basic tools but limited engagement with advanced, interactive technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.