ReviewJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2026
When Resectability Emerges After Systemic Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Proposed Response-Guided Consolidation Framework.
Review in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies have increased the likelihood that a subset of patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may achieve sufficient tumor regression to become technically resectable However, when resectability emerges systemic therapy, the optimal next step remains uncertain. Surgical resection may eradicate residual macroscopic disease, whereas continued systemic therapy may help maintain control of occult micrometastatic disease. In this review, we summarize the available evidence on surgical consolidation after conversion and propose a conceptual response-guided consolidation framework to support post-conversion decision-making. The current evidence base remains dominated by retrospective comparative studies, although early randomized data have recently emerged in selected populations. Overall, surgical consolidation appears feasible and may improve progression-related outcomes in carefully selected responders, but definitive survival benefit across all response categories remains unproven. Within the proposed framework, partial response appears to represent the most consistent clinical scenario supporting surgery, stable disease should be interpreted as a heterogeneous category requiring further biological and radiographic discrimination, and complete response remains the most uncertain setting in which surgery may not always be necessary. Beyond radiographic response alone, pathological response and biomarker-based predictive enrichment may help refine future selection strategies. We therefore suggest that post-conversion resectability should be viewed not simply as a technical surgical endpoint, but as a therapeutic decision point requiring multidisciplinary assessment of anatomical feasibility, response depth and durability, hepatic reserve, and biological risk. This proposed framework is intended as a practical interim model rather than an established clinical standard and requires prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.