Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267180›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa2026

Motivational interviewing for substance use among adults in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Amy S Adams, Taryn Williams, Dan J Stein, Goodman Sibeko, Steven Shoptaw, Stephen Rollnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy S AdamsDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0929-3159
Taryn WilliamsDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5503-0459
Dan J SteinDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-7810
Goodman SibekoDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-0878
Steven ShoptawDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-0026
Stephen RollnickSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1308-4926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Harmful substance use (HSU) poses a significant global health challenge, impacting social, economic, and healthcare systems. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are particularly burdened as a result of limited infrastructure for managing substance-related issues. While evidence-based brief interventions like motivational interviewing (MI) are widely used in high-income countries, research on their effectiveness in LMICs is limited. Aim: This systematic review aims to evaluate studies employing MI as part of interventions for adults with HSU in LMIC settings. Setting: This review focused on studies within low- and middle-income countries which include settings characterised by constrained mental health resources, high treatment gaps for substance use disorders (SUDs), and diverse service delivery contexts. Methods: Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov and GSK Clinical Study Register for publications from 2010 to 2022. A narrative analysis was conducted, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools assessed study quality. Results: Out of 518 publications, 11 studies from five countries met our inclusion criteria. Most were randomised controlled trials, with some using qualitative or mixed methods. The interventions targeted alcohol, opioids, and other drugs. Different strategies were used, including MI-blended with other interventions (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy, behavioural activation, and imaginal desensitisation) or using MI-informed approaches. Conclusion: Overall, MI-informed interventions were shown to improve substance use outcomes in six of the 11 studies, with a significant reduction in substance use. However, further high-quality research with larger samples and rigorous designs is needed to strengthen the evidence base and address potential sources of bias. Contribution: Findings suggest that MI-informed approaches, as a brief intervention, can improve substance use outcomes in resource-constrained environments within LMICs.

Indexed as

addictionbehavioural activationcognitive-behavioural therapyharmful substance useimaginal desensitisationLMICsmotivational interviewingmotivational interviewing-informed interventionssubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID42267180
PMCPMC13243812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.