Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267134›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of disability2026

Healing beyond the physical: Ethical approaches to emotional support in post-stroke recovery.

Olukoya A Olotu, Anthea Rhoda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of disability, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olukoya A OlotuDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5976-6850
Anthea RhodaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5995-0321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is one of the major contributors to long-term disability in the world, with significant emotional and psychological implications for survivors. While physical rehabilitation is often prioritised in post-stroke recovery, the emotional impact, such as grief, anxiety, depression, and identity disruption, remains under-addressed, particularly in a developing country such as South Africa. This article argues for a more ethical, grounded and holistic approach to stroke recovery that prioritises emotional support alongside physical treatment. Drawing on the disciplines of counselling psychology and rehabilitation science, the article explores how interdisciplinary approaches can enhance the emotional needs of stroke patients. Through a conceptual methodology, this article critiques the limitations of biomedical ethics when applied to stroke rehabilitation and proposes a complementary ethical model, such as care and narrative ethics. These frameworks emphasise empathy, relationship-building and meaning-making as central components of ethical care. Through theoretical analysis, the article demonstrates how patients' emotional narratives can inform ethical patient-centred rehabilitation interventions. The article also deliberates the implications for healthcare providers, offers practical recommendations and outlines policy integration strategies for embedding emotional care within rehabilitation programmes. By highlighting the ethical significance of emotional support, the study offers a more compassionate, culturally sensitive and inclusive model of stroke care in line with medical humanities and the future of healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

biomedical ethicscounselling psychologyemotional supportpost-stroke recoveryrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42267134
PMCPMC13243800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.