ArticleJournal of registry management2026
Validation of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for Identifying Preterm Birth and Low Birthweight Infants in Florida Birth Hospitalizations, 2008-2018.
Article in Journal of registry management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for identifying preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW) infants in birth hospital discharge data, using birth certificate records as the reference standard. Methods: We conducted a population-based validation study of Florida live births from 2008-2018 using linked birth certificate and infant hospital discharge records. Birth certificate obstetric estimates and recorded birthweights served as the reference standards. We calculated sensitivity and PPV for Results: Among 2,166,535 infants, 10.3% were preterm and 8.7% LBW. PPV exceeded 92% for PTB and 97% for LBW in both coding eras. Sensitivity improved from 77.0% to 84.4% for PTB and from 73.3% to 76.9% for LBW after the ICD-10-CM transition. Sensitivity for diagnosis codes was notably lower nearest the binary classification thresholds for PTB (37 weeks) and LBW (2500 grams). Coding accuracy was higher in urban teaching hospitals compared to nonteaching or rural hospitals. Conclusions: Infant hospital discharge data can reliably identify markedly preterm or low-birthweight infants but may under-ascertain cases near classification thresholds. Researchers should quantify and adjust for these limitations, for example through quantitative bias analysis or sensitivity analyses to account for misclassification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42267112PMC13245670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.