ArticlePeerJ2026
Physical activity and movement quality among health sciences students: an exploratory cross-sectional study.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: University students often sit for long periods while engaging in variable physical activity (PA). Whether higher PA relates to better movement quality is unclear in Middle East settings. This exploratory cross-sectional study examined associations between PA and Movement quality in health-sciences undergraduates and reported self-reported sitting time from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) sitting item (not a validated sedentary-behavior measure). Methods: Students ( Results: A total of 70 students were included in the analysis, of whom 55.7% scored below 14 on the FMS. The average physical activity level was 3,249.17 ± 2,425.61 MET-min/week, and the mean FMS score was 13.21 ± 2.21. In the adjusted linear model, physical activity was not significantly associated with total FMS score ( Conclusions: Physical activity was not significantly associated with movement quality after adjustment for sex, BMI, sitting time, and academic major. These findings suggest that physical activity alone may not independently explain variation in FMS scores in this sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.