ArticleMedical cannabis and cannabinoids
Targeting Phantom Limb Pain with Cannabinoids in a Rat Model.
Article in Medical cannabis and cannabinoids. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a debilitating neuropathic condition arising after limb loss or nerve injury, with limited effective treatments. Cannabinoids, including cannabidiol (CBD), β-caryophyllene (BCP), and Δ Methods: To model PLP, a chronic constriction injury was used to mimic pre-amputation pain, followed by formalin-induced localized inflammation and complete sciatic nerve transection to simulate extremity amputation. Cannabinoid treatments (CBD/BCP/THC, CBD/BCP, or THC) or vehicle control were administered either preemptively on the day of axotomy (prevention paradigm) or after the emergence of pain behaviors (reversal paradigm). Progression of pain behaviors were assessed over a 72-day period, and modulation of spinal cytokine levels, glial reactivity, and GABAergic signaling was evaluated. Results: Preemptive THC or CBD/BCP reduced PLP onset and severity, while the full combination was less effective. In contrast, with delayed treatment, CBD/BCP and the CBD/BCP/THC combination were most effective in mitigating PLP. Pain reduction was correlated with restoration of spinal GABAergic inhibition. All cannabinoid treatments decreased microglial and astrocyte reactivity and shifted cytokines toward an anti-inflammatory state. Conclusion: Cannabinoid-based interventions demonstrate significant therapeutic promise for PLP, showing efficacy as both early and delayed treatments. Findings suggest that THC may exert greater therapeutic effects when administered pre-emptively, while CBD and BCP may offer greater therapeutic advantages in established pain states. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of tailored cannabinoid interventions for neuropathic pain and underscore the importance of optimizing dosing strategies for maximal analgesic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.