Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267061›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2026

Safety and Efficacy of Oral Azithromycin for Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in Pediatric Patients.

Christopher Brunstetter, Norman E Fenn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher BrunstetterManchester University College of Health Professions, Nursing, & Pharmacy (CB, NEF3), Fort Wayne, IN.
Norman E FennParkview Regional Medical Center (NEF3), Fort Wayne, IN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePediatric patients with gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility have limited pharmacologic options due to questionable efficacy and/or safety profiles. The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety of azithromycin in pediatric patients for GI dysmotility. The secondary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of azithromycin in treating GI dysmotility in pediatric patients.

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2023. Pediatric patients (18 years and younger) who received azithromycin specifically for GI dysmotility were included in the study. Safety endpoints assessed included description of known common and serious adverse events (ADEs) for azithromycin and corrected QT (QTc) interval exceeding 450 milliseconds (ms) using an electrocardiogram. Demographics, indications, dosing regimens, electrocardiographic data, treatment duration, clinical outcomes, and ADEs were assessed.

resultsForty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The cohort was predominantly composed of infants (0-2 years, 55.8%) and female (53.5%). Baseline electrocardiograms were conducted in 41.9% of patients, one of whom had a QTc interval exceeding 450 milliseconds. Median azithromycin dosing was 3 mg/kg/day with a maximum single dose of 300 mg. Treatment duration ranged from 7 days to over 4 years with a median of 56 days. ADEs were described in six patients and were minor in nature with most occurring within two weeks of therapy initiation. Symptom improvement was documented in 18 patients (41.9%).

conclusionsOral azithromycin may represent a safe and viable option in pediatric patients with GI dysmotility.

Indexed as

azithromycindysmotilitygastrointestinalpediatricprokinetic

Identifiers

PMID42267061
PMCPMC13245381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.