ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026
Simultaneous Endoluminal Wound Vacuum and Stent Therapy for Large Esophageal Leaks After Esophagectomy.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- One step backward, two steps forward: esophageal diversion and the staged reconstruction of esophageal catastrophe.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anastomotic leaks from esophageal operations are serious life-threatening medical conditions that traditionally require invasive surgery. In this study, we discuss the outcomes of 3 patients who received minimally invasive simultaneous endoluminal wound vacuum therapy and an esophageal stent (sEV+S) treatment for uncontained esophageal leaks into the pleural space after esophagectomy. Methods: Three patients received sEV+S placement between 2016 and 2024. In this technique, a black sponge sutured to the end of a drain is placed endoscopically into the leak cavity. An esophageal stent is then centered around the leak site. Results: Patients were 54 to 71 years old. All 3 patients were men with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy. The sEV+S placement was performed 2, 10, and 12 times. The total number of endoscopic procedures after the discovery of the leak was 3, 29, and 13. Length of time from leak to resolution was 16, 102, and 88 days. Hospital stay was 46, 113, and 105 days. All patients eventually returned to an oral diet (2 patients at discharge and 1 patient 23 days after discharge). A tracheoesophageal fistula developed in 1 patient requiring esophageal diversion with intercostal muscle flap repair, followed by eventual supercharged jejunal interposition graft reconstruction. Two patients were successfully treated with sEV+S placement. No patients required readmission, and no deaths occurred due to the procedures. Conclusions: We demonstrate that sEV+S treatment can successfully treat large uncontained esophageal leaks after esophagectomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.