ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026
Distal Anastomotic New Entries After Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: An Underreported and Underappreciated Risk?
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection necessitates emergency surgery. Despite proximal repair, dilation of the downstream aorta is often observed. Distal anastomotic new entry (DANE) may drive adverse remodeling and reintervention. We evaluated the incidence, recognition, and impact of DANE after hemiarch and zone 2 arch replacement. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 42 patients with residual dissection after type A dissection surgery between January 2022 and 2024. Twenty-three underwent hemiarch and 22 zone 2 arch replacement. All had preoperative computed tomography and up to 1-year follow-up (or until reintervention) of the descending thoracic aorta. DANE was defined as contrast opacification of the false lumen contiguous with the prosthetic lumen. Outcomes included distal aortic growth (≥5 or ≥10 mm/y), maximum diameter ≥50 mm, and reintervention within 6 and 12 months. Results: DANE was identified in 19 of 42 patients (45%), with similar incidence after hemiarch (45%) and zone 2 (46%) replacement. None were reported in radiology assessments; the multidisciplinary aortic team documented 3 (16%). At 1 year, patients with DANE had larger distal aortic maximum diameters (49.2 vs 40.6 mm; Conclusions: DANE occurred frequently after acute dissection repair and was underreported. Its presence was associated with early distal aortic growth and reinterventions. Systematic imaging review and preventive measures against DANE may improve long-term outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.