ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026
Growth of Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts and Heart Valves As Pediatric Conduits.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Growth is the Holy Grail of tissue implants in pediatrics, yet the outcomes from a small but increasing number of studies have not been assessed using metrics of growth. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify preclinical and pediatric clinical trials of implanted vascular grafts and heart valves, indicating growth of the implant based on a proposed definition of functional regenerative growth: increases in critical physical dimension(s) by increases in tissue mass with maintenance of required function. Results: Five distinct approaches, distinguished by scaffold type and use of preseeded cells, were identified among studies reported for tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) and heart valves (TEHVs), with 2 of these approaches being used for both indications. A total of 11 publications were selected for data tabulation. For TEVGs, increases in length are reported across all studies (14%-130%), whereas diameter change (-38% to +89%) varied with anatomical location. For TEHVs, increases of diameter consistent with somatic growth have been reported for 4 different biologic valves (12%-78%) across preclinical studies. Commensurate leaflet growth has not been clearly established. Conclusions: Growth capacity of TEVGs has been established in preclinical studies for multiple approaches, including some proceeding to clinical trials. For TEHVs, increases in the diameter are reported for several approaches in preclinical studies, but limited evidence exists to date for leaflet growth. TEVGs and TEHVs have both demonstrated potential for growth and, thus, improved clinical outcomes compared with current implants that have no growth capacity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.