Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42267016›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026

Clinical Outcomes of First-Time and Redo Mitral Valve Replacement Using MITRIS RESILIA Bioprosthesis.

Satoshi Kainuma, Tomoki Shimokawa, Tomohiro Iwakura, Haruki Mikoshiba, Atsushi Yano, Atsushi Kurushima, Tatsuo Motoki, Yoshiaki Fukumura, Kazuhisa Sakamoto, Yuki Wada and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Satoshi KainumaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoki ShimokawaSakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro IwakuraSakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruki MikoshibaSakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi YanoSakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi KurushimaJapanese Red Cross Tokushima Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Tatsuo MotokiJapanese Red Cross Tokushima Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Yoshiaki FukumuraJapanese Red Cross Tokushima Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Kazuhisa SakamotoKokura Memorial Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuki WadaKokura Memorial Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nobuhisa OhnoKokura Memorial Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomoki UshijimaKyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Akira ShioseKyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Katsuhiro OmaeDepartment of Data Science, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Research Center, Osaka, Japan.
Manabu MinamiDepartment of Data Science, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Research Center, Osaka, Japan.
Haruko YamamotoDepartment of Data Science, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Research Center, Osaka, Japan.
Rieko KutsuzawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Shinya TajimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoyuki FujitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Satsuki FukushimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The MITRIS RESILIA bioprosthetic valve incorporates anticalcification technology and is designed to facilitate implantation in fragile mitral annuli. However, clinical data on its safety and hemodynamic performance remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 140 patients (mean age, 75 ± 8 years; 44% male) who underwent first-time (n = 100) or redo (n = 40) mitral valve replacement (MVR) with a MITRIS RESILIA valve between 2021 and 2022. The primary indication for first-time MVR was mitral regurgitation, followed by mitral stenosis, whereas that for redo MVR was prosthetic valve dysfunction, followed by failed repair. The mean follow-up duration was 36 ± 14 months (415 patient-years). Results: The most frequently implanted valve size was 27 mm (31%), followed by 29 mm (26%) and 25 mm (24%). Thirty-day mortality was 2.0% for first-time MVR patients and 0% for redo patients. At 3 years, freedom from all-cause mortality, reoperation, stroke, and structural valve deterioration was 89%, 99%, 96%, and 100%, respectively, with no intergroup differences. The mixed effects model found stable and favorable prosthetic hemodynamics over time-reflected by mean pressure gradients, effective orifice area, and the absence of major paravalvular leakage. Both groups showed sustained reductions in left atrial size and tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient, accompanied by parallel improvements in New York Heart Association functional class (all time effect Conclusions: First-time and redo MVR with the MITRIS RESILIA valve was associated with low perioperative mortality, favorable safety, and durable hemodynamic performance. These findings support its use across a broad spectrum of mitral valve diseases.

Identifiers

PMID42267016
PMCPMC13245502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.