ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026
Clinical Outcomes of First-Time and Redo Mitral Valve Replacement Using MITRIS RESILIA Bioprosthesis.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The MITRIS RESILIA bioprosthetic valve incorporates anticalcification technology and is designed to facilitate implantation in fragile mitral annuli. However, clinical data on its safety and hemodynamic performance remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 140 patients (mean age, 75 ± 8 years; 44% male) who underwent first-time (n = 100) or redo (n = 40) mitral valve replacement (MVR) with a MITRIS RESILIA valve between 2021 and 2022. The primary indication for first-time MVR was mitral regurgitation, followed by mitral stenosis, whereas that for redo MVR was prosthetic valve dysfunction, followed by failed repair. The mean follow-up duration was 36 ± 14 months (415 patient-years). Results: The most frequently implanted valve size was 27 mm (31%), followed by 29 mm (26%) and 25 mm (24%). Thirty-day mortality was 2.0% for first-time MVR patients and 0% for redo patients. At 3 years, freedom from all-cause mortality, reoperation, stroke, and structural valve deterioration was 89%, 99%, 96%, and 100%, respectively, with no intergroup differences. The mixed effects model found stable and favorable prosthetic hemodynamics over time-reflected by mean pressure gradients, effective orifice area, and the absence of major paravalvular leakage. Both groups showed sustained reductions in left atrial size and tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient, accompanied by parallel improvements in New York Heart Association functional class (all time effect Conclusions: First-time and redo MVR with the MITRIS RESILIA valve was associated with low perioperative mortality, favorable safety, and durable hemodynamic performance. These findings support its use across a broad spectrum of mitral valve diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.