ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026
The United States Experience With Combined Lung+Liver Transplantation.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Combined lung+liver transplant (CLLT) is a rare procedure for patients with end-stage lung and liver failure, but has recently gained traction, with many academic centers performing CLLT for the first time. This study describes the state of CLLT in the United States and assesses outcomes. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing Database was queried for all CLLT between October 1994 and March 2024. Transplant sequence was determined by utilizing individual organ ischemic times. Cumulative risk was assessed to determine primary causes of graft failure or death after CLLT, and risk stratification was defined based on patient survival status, lung-graft status, or liver-graft status. Posttransplant survival was further assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: A total of 193 CLLTs were analyzed across 39 centers. The number of CLLTs has increased over the last decade. Most of the transplants were lung(s) followed by liver (157 of 179, 87.7%). Most were male (121 of 179, 67.6%), and the median age at transplant was 47 years (interquartile range, 25-59 years). Kaplan-Meier survival at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years was: 96.3% (95% CI, 92.6%-99.0%), 85.1% (95% CI, 80.1%-90.5%), 81.5% (95% CI, 76.0%-87.4%), 70.4% (95% CI, 63.7%-77.9%), 63.2% (95% CI, 55.7%-71.6%), and 53.3% (95% CI, 44.1%-64.3%). No difference was evident in survival between lung-first or liver-first sequences. Most deaths were due to non-graft-related causes. Conclusions: CLLT is growing in popularity and serves as a viable option for patients with combined end-stage lung disease and end-stage liver disease. CLLT shows excellent longitudinal survival. No difference exists in survival between a lung-first approach and a liver-first approach. Most deaths after CLLT are unrelated to liver-graft or lung-graft failure.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.