Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42266976›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026

Use of the TREAT 2.0 Model to Create a Web-Based Lung Nodule Calculator for High-Risk Patients.

Palina Woodhouse, Caroline M Godfrey, Sheau-Chiann Chen, Heidi Chen, Valerie Welty, Patrick M Meyers, Fabien Maldonado, Michael Knight, Stephen A Deppen, Eric L Grogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Palina WoodhouseDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Caroline M GodfreyDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sheau-Chiann ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Heidi ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Valerie WeltyDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Patrick M MeyersDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Fabien MaldonadoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Michael KnightDivision of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Stephen A DeppenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Eric L GroganDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Validation of Biomarkers of Risk for the Early Detection of Lung CancerU01CA152662 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEPPEN, STEPHEN, GROGAN, ERIC L · 2010 to 2025
$12.8M
Clinical Utility of Biomarkers Driven Management of Indeterminate Pulmonary NodulesR01CA252964 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Eric L Grogan, Alexander Mark Kaizer · 2021 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA252964NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Indeterminate pulmonary nodules are common in clinical practice. The probability of cancer drives management decisions and depends on age, smoking, size, positron emission tomography avidity, growth, and the clinical setting, among other variables. We developed a web-based calculator for clinician use, using the Thoracic Research Evaluation and Treatment (TREAT) 2.0 model, previously developed by our group. This study evaluated calculator accuracy when the most common missing data patterns in the clinical setting occurred. Methods: A web-based calculator was designed for clinical use of the TREAT 2.0 model. We used a parsimonious modeling approach to select the 8 most important missing data patterns. Model accuracy and discrimination were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and Brier scores. Bootstrap internal validation was used for overfit correction. Results: The AUC for the complete cases (all 13 variables) was 0.91(CI: 0.87-0.92), and it was 0.83 (CI: 0.77-0.88) for the training and validation data sets, respectively, with a Brier score of 0.11. The mean AUC for the 8 most common missing variable submodels included in the calculator was 0.79, with a Brier score of 0.14 in the validation data set. Conclusions: The TREAT 2.0 calculator provides reliable risk predictions for indeterminate pulmonary nodules being evaluated in high-cancer prevalence settings while maintaining accuracy with incomplete input of the most common missing variables in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID42266976
PMCPMC13245350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.